<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aarmstrong.org/journal/2009/12/23/avatar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aarmstrong.org/journal/2009/12/23/avatar</link>
	<description>Website and journal of Andrew Armstrong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://aarmstrong.org/journal/2009/12/23/avatar/comment-page-1#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarmstrong.org/?p=1585#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>I could add a ton of film comparisons, it&#039;d be spoiler-riffic though, so ignore Souviks post if you want to avoid spoilers ;)

I didn&#039;t find &lt;em&gt;Surrogates&lt;/em&gt; terribly fun, sadly, since it was a poor sci-fi film (it largely made next to no sense and meandered along haphazardly, even if the concept would have been interesting it left a sour taste in the mouth!). I saw your comparison, I guess it makes a lot of sense comparing them, just not my cup of tea to reflect on either film much - talk about them and they&#039;ll make sequels (well, &lt;em&gt;Avatar&lt;/em&gt; will get a sequel anyway...).

But in any case, see &lt;em&gt;Moon&lt;/em&gt; if you can, a much better film. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could add a ton of film comparisons, it&#8217;d be spoiler-riffic though, so ignore Souviks post if you want to avoid spoilers <img src='http://aarmstrong.org/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t find <em>Surrogates</em> terribly fun, sadly, since it was a poor sci-fi film (it largely made next to no sense and meandered along haphazardly, even if the concept would have been interesting it left a sour taste in the mouth!). I saw your comparison, I guess it makes a lot of sense comparing them, just not my cup of tea to reflect on either film much &#8211; talk about them and they&#8217;ll make sequels (well, <em>Avatar</em> will get a sequel anyway&#8230;).</p>
<p>But in any case, see <em>Moon</em> if you can, a much better film. <img src='http://aarmstrong.org/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Souvik</title>
		<link>http://aarmstrong.org/journal/2009/12/23/avatar/comment-page-1#comment-4829</link>
		<dc:creator>Souvik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarmstrong.org/?p=1585#comment-4829</guid>
		<description>Yep, full of cliches it is. Someone just told me today that it was Pocahontas&#039;s plot with a few lines struck off. There are other reasons for which I like it though. A comparison with Surrogates would also be useful.

In general, Andrew&#039;s reading is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, full of cliches it is. Someone just told me today that it was Pocahontas&#8217;s plot with a few lines struck off. There are other reasons for which I like it though. A comparison with Surrogates would also be useful.</p>
<p>In general, Andrew&#8217;s reading is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

